Hypocrisy and lies, it seems, are everywhere nowadays, but not because society has gotten worse over time. On the contrary, it is simply the result of sanity having gradually increased. Normal people are now just starting to recognise the many similarities between the religions we are told to accept (or at least tolerate) and those (or rather the one) we are supposed to hate.
In this document I will attempt to convince you that you should have the same attitude towards Catholicism, Islam and Protestantism, as you probably have towards Nazism (and perhaps also other forms of Communism). Ie. Catholics, Muhammadans, Protestants, Atheists (although not necessarily atheists), Feminists, Marxists, Bolsheviks and Globalists are all (at least technically) neo-Nazis, even if moderate.
The reason why this is so important is not that Catholicism and Protestantism are nowadays a major problem, but because of the serious threat of Islam. Unlike the other medieval religions, Islam has not been substantially dumbed down - not that it’s even possible (even if we had time), since the propaganda is quite different.
Catholicism, and thus Protestantism, are based on a devious betrayal of Jesus’s teachings, which fortunately allowed more modern forms to be slowly created that take much of the propaganda literally. Ie. most modern “Christians” are close to true (early) Christians in practise. Followers of Muhammad however, only have her medieval ideas to either obey or reject. Thus we must consider Islam to be an especially dangerous religion, treating it similarly to the way Nazism was treated, both before and after World War Two. The alternative is to learn the hard way, yet again.
Tragically, at least one holocaust will probably be necessary, because the Media and Academia have been infiltrated by Communists, worldwide. Since they are mainly intersectional radical Feminists, they are determined to infantilise Muhammadans just as they do to women. Such appeasement makes even the most fanatical followers of Muhammad seem mostly harmless, just like the abject coward Neville Chamberlain considered the original followers of Hitler.
A truly prehistoric motivation, but back when we were living in tribes, very little property was available to steal, and large families tend to share most things anyway. In societies however, it’s impossible for anyone to know everyone else. This creates a hierarchy of power, based primarily on wealth. It is therefore not surprising that many religions are based (at the very least) on theft.
Catholicism has long been shameless in its pursuit of absolute power, using its enormous wealth as propaganda for its other abuses. Even today, the monarchy situated in the Vatican, is able to blatantly display lavish excesses of opulence, while also claiming to represent the poor! Just as it used to support other European monarchies for profit, so today both rich and poor alike, all over the world, continue to give to it like crazy. Protestant televangelists can only hope and pray to be as successful.
Muhammad was of course a massive thief, hijacking trading caravans to and from Mecca, whilst living in Medina. This is how she financed her lavish lifestyle, including long after becoming the Meccan dictator (through taxes). It’s also primarily how she attracted a large bodyguard of similar violent fanatics. The term “what your right hand possesses” continues to be used by Islamic organisations to justify stealing from (and killing) those who refuse to follow Muhammad’s insane preachings. This includes the Jizya tax levied on Jews, Catholics and Protestants who are unfortunate enough to live under Islamic Sharia Law.
Like all dictators, the Nazis were lovers of other people’s property, and if it wasn’t for all the torture and mass murder, Nazism would nowadays be known mainly as a movement based on plunder. Currency, gold, land, houses, art works, clothing, eye glasses, dental fillings, human hair and skin - the Nazis stole it all.
I’m going to use a loose definition here, but what is rape if not severe violation of sexual freedom? Just as pimps are much worse than your average criminal rapist (due to sexually enslaving their victims), religious organisations are potentially much worse again.
Sex is the ultimate form of friendship, that uses mainly touch and movement to communicate life experience and inspiration, on a direct emotional level. This means in order to be truly sexually intimate, one must have a high level of individuality. However, the problem for societies is that the powerful are always at least somewhat corrupt, and thus their hierarchical submissiveness makes intimacy difficult, due to the relative lack of individuality in any kind of strict organisation. This is why they have problems with friendship, but even more with sex - because of its emotional power, which subverts the limitations of merely intellectual social rules.
This is why all religious organisations restrict sexual freedom to some extent, and the worst ones severely oppress it. Thus we observe widespread puritanism, pedophilia/homophobia, rape, child rape, and severe punishment of honest and friendly sex. Nb. homophobia is actually a form of pedophilia, since what is offensive about two men (and to a lesser extent, two women) having sex is that it’s clearly sex between adults (in a society that infantilises women). Ie. normal, socially acceptable, heterosexuality has always been at least moderately pedophilic.
The Catholic Church has always used the Bible to justify its many forms of tyranny, and its hatred of sex is perhaps the best example. Monogamy has long been strictly enforced, even though it’s somewhat unnatural, and based on fear of intimacy, like pedophilia is. Rape and child rape have long been practised within the priesthood, and deviously covered up. It’s interesting that various Catholic leaders have claimed that they simply didn’t know about it, which is an obscenely secular excuse. Surely Jesus (etc) would have been screaming down from Heaven at every pope in history to put a stop to it! Their ongoing love for pedophilia of course extends to homophobia, which continues to be widely practised. One of the most unfairly persecuted groups in human history, homosexuals, are still being condemned by such a perverted hierarchy, just for wanting to be sexually intimate.
Both the Catholics and Protestants have a shameful record of molesting children in their care, and massively lying about it, in various types of institutions. This includes those of government, in nations where each Church was/is dominant. Religious people in Academia and the Media also conspired to cover up this abuse, until the advent of the internet forced them to break ranks.
No discussion of the history of rape would be complete, without mentioning the man who was probably the greatest sexual rapist in all of human history: Muhammad. Not only was she a pedophile and child rapist (yes, according to Islamic scripture), but she had numerous sex slaves, and promoted rape and sexual slavery as weapons of war. She of course utterly condemned homosexuals - even dictating a particular method by which they should be executed. She also had many wives, and allowed her followers to have as many as four - massively increasing sexual competition, and severe loneliness amongst men. Of course, sex outside of marriage was/is severely punished - including being a victim of rape. Since sex in Islam is seen as naturally violent, men and women suffering from sexual deprivation aren’t likely to be shown much sympathy, especially since infant genital mutilation is compulsory for boys, and thus recommended for girls. This also explains why it was so common for Islamic slave traders to castrate their male slaves, which is the ultimate form of sexual rape.
Nb. the idea that Muhammad was the greatest rapist in all of human history may seem controversial, but consider the fact that Adolf Hitler was one of the greatest mass murderers in human history - her crimes against humanity were committed with lies, not violence. Ie. both of these dictators’ atrocities were indirect, done via the emotional manipulation of others.
Rape is an area where the Nazis were more civilised than the medieval religions, but they still couldn’t stand homosexuality, and also treated women like children. Hitler was clearly at least a moderate pedophile, managing to traumatise many of her sexual partners. She did however appreciate the affections of Eva Braun, which is not surprising since the woman was so immature (even by the standards of the time).
Pedophilia is surely the main way in which power corrupts! The only solution? Get rid of the power structures (as much as is practical) - including all religion.
Pain is the experience of memory loss, and torture is the political exploitation of this necessary aspect of the brain. It can be done to extract information, to punish criminals, but is mostly used to maintain power. This includes in somewhat civilised prisons, and against the poor, where deprivation builds up in the brain over time.
The Catholics and the Protestants were both experts in torture, with torture devices being amongst their most advanced technologies. They loved to see their political enemies in agony, but explained their sadism as a form of love. They believed that the more someone suffered, the purer they became - the complete opposite of the truth. They also believed that they were saving their enemies from Hell, by forcing ideological conformity, but also believed in creating hell on Earth to punish everyone anyway. This is perhaps the main reason why it’s called the Roman Catholic Church - the Romans were also prolific torturers.
Muhammad was somewhat of a reformer in this regard - she didn’t believe in torturing anyone and everyone like the Catholics and Protestants, but of course did use it against her many political enemies. Islam is more civilised than the other medieval religions, since it mostly emphasises the idea of covert or die, not convert/confess or be tortured and then killed. She was also against torturing animals, though her modern day followers generally are not.
The Nazis of course had plenty of historical examples to follow when torturing people, but also used electricity. This includes so called “electro-convulsive therapy” (accurately known as “electrolytically distributed lobotomy”), which they invented. However, the main way in which they tortured people was starvation and back-breaking labour.
Slavery is as old as history, since it’s just so convenient, both materially and politically. Why merely kill your enemies, when you can watch them suffer, both from afar and in the home, for the rest of their lives?
The Catholic Church’s early history featured a number of movements to abolish slavery, motivated by the need to free Catholics from the power of ancient Roman culture. However, later on they approved of it, in order to control and punish non-believers. Nowadays the Church continues to oppress people, all over the world, using more devious methods - so many people, devoted to following stupid rules, in fear of being tortured forever.
Muhammad seems to have never come across a sick idea she didn’t like, and slavery is no exception. She even made a point of motivating her closest followers with the freedom to kidnap, rape, torture and mutilate the many enemies of Islam in war. While Muhammad believed it was good to free slaves, she also believed that slavery was simply an unavoidable aspect of human nature, so it therefore had to be legislated for all time. So much for the “most perfect” human being who ever lived.
Slavery is an area where the Protestants excelled at, for centuries, during the Atlantic slave trade. Using the Bible of course as propaganda, and ignoring the New Testament, they were extremely brutal. This despite it being very straightforward to legislate limitations on the cruelty. Such human rights laws would have even increased productivity, so we must conclude that their love of slavery, which still continues today in the U.S. prison system, was primarily motivated by sadism, not economics. These abject cowards were the opposite of Christians.
The Nazis of course widely practised slavery, both in slave labour camps, death camps, and throughout the whole of Nazi Germany in more subtle ways. They differed from many other fanatics throughout history in that they largely spared the young, the old, and the disabled, preferring to kill them quickly. Since they had such a large supply of hated people to choose from, they didn’t pay much attention to the health and well being of their slaves, and simply worked them to death, while also starving them - and even more severely punished anyone who even slightly objected.
All four of these religions also practise slavery against their own members, with severe penalties for leaving the fold. Since Catholicism and Protestantism have long persecuted unbelievers the most, they don’t generally discriminate between those who have never been members and apostates. Islam and Nazism however, being somewhat tolerant towards unbelievers, need to eliminate the embarrassment of those who have left. Thus we have the death penalty for apostates, which in modern day Nazism is known as “blood in, blood out”.
War is of course as old as humanity, but in societies it takes on a much greater purpose than simply a means for greed and temporary power. It becomes a method of ongoing social control, by traumatising and eliminating ordinary men, whose honest practicality (masculinity) has long been the main threat to the powerful. Men and women are encouraged to both depend on and fear each other, so that women are kept infantilised and men dehumanised. However nowadays, war is mostly obsolete in former Catholic and Protestant societies, partially due to the introduction of Feminism, which mostly uses deception instead of violence.
The Catholic Church has long blessed war as a form of necessary defence of the faith. This includes the centuries long conflict against the Protestants, but also the genuinely necessary Crusades against Islam. Muhammad was a truly dedicated warlord, ordering her followers to spread Islam by force if necessary, all over the world. This ancient jihad continues today in just about every nation.
The Nazis and the Bolsheviks, understandably close allies, soon fell victim to their neo-medievalism, and found it necessary to fight each other, rather than their relatively non-totalitarian enemies. This created a truce between the West and the Soviet Union, which was quickly dissolved after the defeat of the Nazis. Thus followed the Cold War, with the surviving Communist nations being forced to express their hatred for freedom and democracy mostly using deception, due to the threat of nuclear weapons. Even today, most people continue to believe that Nazism is the opposite of the various other forms of Communism.
Sometimes a group of people are just so objectionable, that they simply have to be exterminated. This is of course always unnecessary, with the motivation always being bigoted and political. Political dissidents have always been persecuted, but they actively fight against the powerful. It’s those who just want to lives their lives in peace, and if necessary in oppression, that are most often targeted for genocide.
Imagine you are a devout follower of Catholicism, Islam or Protestantism. You know for sure that you know the truth, and different people don’t. After all, God has clearly told you - even coming down to Earth in person, and/or appointing very special messengers. It’s a God that is very jealous, and really hates the same people that you hate. What are you going to do, simply ignore the sacred doctrine, and insist that God probably wants us all to love each other? Of course not - there’s a power structure to defend, lots of money to be made, violent sex to be had, enemies to murder, etc. But what if there’s a group of people who just don’t get it? Who simply, and quietly, refuse to obey? They set a terrible example to everyone else, and so must be demonised.
The Jews are of course the best example of this - especially since they still manage to succeed in life, even under extreme persecution. Muhammad, Martin Luther, Adolf Hitler, and I’m sure many popes and other monarchs, dreamed of the “final solution” - a world without those damn embarrassing Jews. This is why there are billions of Catholics, Muhammadans and Protestants, but only a few million Jews in the entire world.
Homosexuals are a different case, with their embarrassing behaviour being emotional rather than intellectual. They have long been murdered simply for being blatantly less pedophilic than the majority.
And so what of the Nazis? They simply changed the propaganda, using a simplistic perversion of evolution, instead of theology. They hated, persecuted and exterminated basically the same groups of people, for the same basic reasons. They were merely following up where the others left off.
However, at least the Nazis mostly targeted minorities, which substantially lowers the death toll, compared to just targeting anyone by quota. This was the policy of both the Stalinists and also the medieval witch finders of Catholicism and Protestantism. When one’s self hatred and/or hatred of life becomes too great, it can easily end up being directed at just about anyone.
Religion has often been called the ultimate achievement of humanity. In one sense this is true: it’s the ultimate form of deception.
Jesus may or may not have existed, and may or may not have been a satirist. One thing is certain however: she was quite a decent character (even by modern standards). The same cannot be said for her so called followers. They have twisted her teachings in so many different ways, that it’s barely worth trying to be a genuine Christian. The same is also true of the followers of Muhammad, though the worst are actually those that follow her accurately. This is true whether or not Muhammad actually existed - since there is substantial evidence that the Islamic empire predated their prophet.
I could spend a lot of time explaining the many different types of lie that religious people tell (to themselves and others), but it’s barely worth the effort. However, one type of massive lie stands out: normal theism. Followers of the medieval religions will often simply proclaim that God exists, without even attempting to argue that it surely must be interventionist (let alone an ignorant, fascist, torturing psychopath). If we assume that there is a God, then all the available evidence points to one conclusion: that such a wise being probably wants us to simply learn for ourselves. There is no good reason to believe that it would be so foolishly immoral as to dictate “holy” books, send down (or up) prophets, or found supposedly benign dictatorships. It surely wouldn’t be our totalitarian “Big Brother”.
In conclusion: all successful religions all devious bullshit, which is why there are so many of them. The Catholic, Islamic and Protestant god images are simply the alter egos of their many dictators. Nazism in this respect is by far the most honest - which is of course why it’s the most hated: it’s a huge ongoing embarrassment.
By Mark J. Skinner.
Last modified: 2025-09-07 03:54:45 UTC.